England seal series in thriller

England produced world-class death bowling coupled with moments of brilliance in the field to snatch a five-run victory in the deciding Twenty20

The Report by Andrew McGlashan27-Feb-2012
Scorecard and ball-by-ball detailsJade Dernbach sinks to his knees after earning England a narrow victory•Getty Images

England produced world-class death bowling coupled with moments of brilliance in the field to snatch a five-run victory in the deciding Twenty20 against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi and seal the series 2-1. With Misbah-ul-Haq and Umar Akmal together, needing 35 off the last five overs, Pakistan were in control but Stuart Broad and Jade Dernbach showed nerves of steel to finish the tour on a high.Broad bowled the 16th and 19th overs which cost just four runs apiece and that included a misfield by Jonny Bairstow at long-on in the penultimate over which gave away a boundary. Broad removed Akmal, who skied a catch to long-off after missing the first two balls of the 19th over, and Bairstow redeemed himself in the last with a powerful throw to Craig Kieswetter which found Shahid Afridi short of his crease.Dernbach, who bowled the 17th over for six runs, was left with 13 to play with for the last and was in control except when a slower ball looped out short to be called wide. That left Pakistan needing eight off three deliveries but Hammad Azam and Misbah could only muster two singles before a trademark slower ball from Dernbach castled Misbah and set of wild celebrations from the bowler.The series win, a notable result for Broad who is still in his infancy as a captain, will give the England squad a significant surge of confidence ahead of their title defence at the World Twenty20 in Sri Lanka. Their remaining T20s before that tournament are all at home, so success in conditions similar – if not identical – to Sri Lanka will have provided a wealth of knowledge especially for the younger players.Misbah, meanwhile, could well face further criticism after ending with 28 off 32 balls but it should have been the anchor innings to guide his side home. Only in the final four overs did the asking rate hit eight-an-over and some of Akmal’s wild heaves to leg didn’t show very clear thinking. It had been difficult to hit boundaries all evening – the match produced 15 fours and three sixes – and huge credit must go to England’s bowlers and fielders. Graeme Swann built pressure for the quicks with a guileful spell and Jos Buttler, having endured a poor series with the bat, manufactured a wicket with a flat throw that was superbly collected by Kieswetter to remove the well-set Asad Shafiq.It is a fine line batsmen tread in Twenty20. For the failure of Misbah to get his side across the line there is the success of Kevin Pietersen after his unbeaten 62, made from a sedate 52 balls, gave England a defendable total. It was clear early on that this wasn’t a 150 pitch and Pietersen judged it was better to stay until the end than aim too high. Samit Patel contributed a spritely 16 and Pietersen finished the innings with a last-ball six off Aizaz Cheema which ultimately proved the difference.What Eoin Morgan would give for some of Pietersen’s end-of-tour form. His last innings of the trip was a tortured affair, as many of the 16 before this one had also been. He chipped short of long-off against Afridi on 6 and should have been stumped on 8 as Akmal added another error to a long list. But this one didn’t prove costly although Morgan was left cursing a team-mate rather than himself. Pietersen drove firmly to cover, where Misbah fumbled, and didn’t adhere to the adage of “don’t run on a misfield”, leaving Morgan stuffed when he changed his mind again.Bairstow couldn’t repeat his showing from two days ago as he misjudged the length against Saeed Ajmal, who claimed 4 for 23, and England’s other young middle-order batsman, Buttler, had another tough innings. He scored four runs off the nine combined deliveries he faced from Ajmal and Afridi and was then given lbw against Ajmal playing a sweep that left him on his knees in the crease. This tour hasn’t launched Buttler’s international career as it appeared it could do but he can still make the World Twenty20.Crucially, however, Umar Gul had a poor day. Trying to react to Pietersen’s movement in the crease, he conceded five wides down the leg side and, in his final over, sprayed another wide outside off stump with Pietersen proceeding to hit the seventh ball to the midwicket boundary. That’s all it takes to change a tight Twenty20.

Clarke set for third term with ECB

Giles Clarke is set to remain as ECB chairman until at least 2015 after being nominated unopposed for a third term

ESPNcricinfo staff29-Feb-2012Giles Clarke is set to remain as ECB chairman until at least 2015 after being nominated unopposed for a third term. His candidacy will now be put forward to a vote of the 41 full members of the ECB and the result will be known in mid-March.Clarke succeeded David Morgan as ECB chairman in 2007 and was re-elected in 2009 having beaten off the challenge of Lord Marland – who has since been appointed to a government post and is therefore ineligible for a position with a sporting body.”I am most grateful and honoured by the first-class counties and MCC in being re-nominated for the role,” said Clarke. “I am especially grateful to Colin Graves and the Yorkshire committee for proposing me and to Chris Grant and the Derbyshire committee, and Percy Price and the Worcestershire committee for seconding me.”Before taking up the role of chairman Clarke, as ECB chairman of marketing, was instrumental in the controversial deal that saw live television rights sold exclusively to Sky Sports in 2005. In January, he brokered an extended agreement, with Sky remaining the sole live broadcaster of cricket until 2017 after paying an estimated £260 million.Clarke recently settled his legal dispute with sports marketing company IMG out of court. IMG had brought a libel case against Clarke over an email he sent to the BCCI about meetings between the Indian board, IMG and several county representatives over what Clarke thought were discussions about forming an IPL-style competition in England.Edited by Alan Gardner

Clarke fights but West Indies still on top

West Indies remained firmly on top after three days of attritional cricket in Barbados, where Darren Sammy’s early strikes and Devendra Bishoo’s variations kept Australia’s batsmen from making significant progress

The Report by Brydon Coverdale09-Apr-2012
Scorecard and ball-by-ball detailsDarren Sammy had David Warner caught at slip•AFP

West Indies remained firmly on top after three days of attritional cricket in Barbados, where Darren Sammy’s early strikes and Devendra Bishoo’s variations kept Australia’s batsmen from making significant progress. At stumps on day three Australia were 248 for 5, with Michael Hussey on 47 and Matthew Wade on 19, and while they had almost passed the follow-on mark they were not yet safe in the match.The big challenge for West Indies remained finding a way to turn their impressive performance into a victory. Rain again played a part on the third afternoon and their task for the final two days was to run through Australia’s lower order quickly, bat again and set the visitors a target, and then skittle them a second time. The way this match has unfolded so far, that looked like it would be easier said than done.But through Sammy and his colleagues West Indies had at least put themselves in the much stronger position. Last time the two sides met in a Caribbean Test series, the hosts had several days of inspired cricket but were unable to string together enough in one match to take a victory from Australia. This time they had started with two encouraging days, and worked through the third in the same fashion.Michael Clarke provided Australia with a fighting half-century but threw his wicket away, while Shane Watson and David Warner also failed to capitalise on solid starts. Watson was also accountable for the ugly run-out of Ricky Ponting, a calamitous confusion that left Ponting fuming as he walked off the field.The pair had come together after Sammy removed both openers in almost identical fashion, pitching the ball on off stump and nipping it away from the left-handers Warner and Ed Cowan. Cowan was on 14 when his thin edge found the wicketkeeper and Warner had made a promising start and had 42 when he edged to second slip, and Sammy’s accuracy and persistence was impressive.Those strikes were followed by the run-out of Ponting for 4 when Watson turned the ball behind square leg and took a single, and then called for the second, hesitated, and called Ponting through again. The throw from the deep to the wicketkeeper’s end found a confused Ponting out of his ground as Watson loitered halfway down the pitch and Ponting’s frustration was evident.Watson was nearly involved in another run-out later when Clarke was saved only by a wayward throw. That, together with poor use of the review system, were the only real blemishes that could be attached to the West Indies fielding effort. Twice Watson survived lbw appeals that could easily have gone against him, once when he offered no shot to a prodigious inswinger from Sammy, who asked for a review and saw the replays show a perilously close prediction that had the ball hitting off stump, but only in the “umpire’s call” zone.In the next over, Kemar Roach appealed for lbw against Watson and also received a not-out verdict. This time Sammy decided against asking for a review but replays showed the ball would have struck enough of leg stump to have the decision overturned. West Indies wasted their second review after lunch when Sammy was off the ground and the vice-captain Kirk Edwards asked for the third umpire to check another Roach lbw appeal that was clearly sliding down leg.But those errors of judgment didn’t prove too costly. Watson threw his wicket away in the first over after lunch when he flashed impetuously at Roach and was caught behind for 39. It was hardly the innings Australia needed from Watson in his first Test batting at No.3. Clarke and Michael Hussey led a fightback with an 82-run partnership and they had to work hard against Bishoo, whose variations kept them from scoring freely.Clarke used his feet against the legspinner and lofted him straight down the ground for six, but otherwise the Australians typically waited for poor balls from Bishoo and did the best they could to keep the good ones out. Clarke brought up his half-century from his 121st delivery with a fine cover-driven boundary from the part-time offspin of Narsingh Deonarine, and he was fortunate to have got there after a contentious review when he was on 27.Clarke was adjudged caught behind off a Bishoo ball that stayed low and he immediately challenged the out decision from the umpire Tony Hill. Replays did not clearly show that he hit the ball but nor did there seem to be overwhelming evidence to overturn the call, but that was what happened and it was a serious let-off for Clarke.Eventually, Bishoo had his reward when Clarke tried to clear long-off but succeeded only in skying a catch, and it was an unwise shot selection at a time when Clarke and Hussey needed to continue building their partnership. Hussey was more watchful and by stumps was approaching a half-century, and Wade struggled against Bishoo with a packed close-in field, but he was good enough to put away the bad balls when they came.Bishoo’s challenge on the fourth day will be to run through the tail, although with the new ball due Sammy will first turn to his fast men to do that job. And if they can manage it, victory will be a possibility, although a draw remains the more likely outcome.

Ajmal not keen on developing new variations

On Pakistan’s upcoming tour of Sri Lanka, Saeed Ajmal said, he will look to keep things ‘simple’

Umar Farooq19-May-2012Saeed Ajmal is known for his straight talk and has a tendency to make big, carefree declarations at press conferences. On Saturday though, which was the last day of Pakistan’s preparatory camp in Lahore, he was rather cautious while fielding the media’s questions. On the tour of Sri Lanka, he said, he will look to keep things ‘simple’.Does he have another new delivery to unveil, following the ‘teesra’ that he dished out against England in the UAE earlier this year? “There is no need to introduce any new delivery, let us keep things simple,” Ajmal said. “Mastering any new delivery takes time and a lot of work is involved in it. With more varieties, more complications are created [for the bowler]. So I would like to just take control of my conventional spin, which is giving me results.”For now, Ajmal said, he is focussing on just bowling at his best and displacing South Africa’s Dale Steyn as the world’s No. 1 Test bowler. “Presently my focus is to win the series [in Sri Lanka] for Pakistan. The goal is to archive the No. 1 spot [on the rankings], for that I am putting in a lot of hard work.”Ajmal did not have much of an impact the previous time Pakistan played in Sri Lanka, as the visitors went on to lose both the Tests and ODIs. This time, Ajmal is looking to compensate for that below-par showing. “Things are going in my way [recently], I will try to extend my recent form. I am ready to take on the Sri Lanka challenge once again.””My body is fully fit and ready to cope the heat [in Sri Lanka], and I know onus will be on the spinners. We[spinners] have to bowl more overs than the fast bowlers because of the heat. But I think we have fast bowlers who can provide a breakthrough even in shorter spells, and they will be equally important. [Abdur] Rehman I make a good pair, and we are ready to bowl longer spells.”While wary of the likes of Thilan Samaraweera and Kumar Sangakkara, Ajmal said Pakistan is quite confident. “We have been practicing assuming that we will be playing on batting [batsmen-friendly] pitches there. We have been doing well for quite a long time now, so I don’t think plans will be difficult for us to execute. They have got some good batsman like Sanga and Samaraweera, who had scored runs against us the last time in the UAE, but we still produced good results against them.”

Sales puts wind behind Northamptonshire

David Sales hit a valuable half-century as Northamptonshire built a lead of 240 against Hampshire, with five second-innings wickets in hand

04-May-2012
ScorecardDavid Sales made the first half-century of the match as Northamptonshire went into the final day against Hampshire in control. Andrew Hall took 4 for 24 as Hampshire were skittled before tea for 154, 64 runs behind, with James Vince top-scoring with an unbeaten 46.Northants then extended their lead to 240 at the close, with Sales making 58. David Balcombe was the pick of the visitors’ bowling, taking 2 for 63.Hampshire began the day on 42 for 3 – after Thursday’s play was abandoned without a ball bowled – with their stand-in captain and former Australia international Simon Katich on 4 and Liam Dawson on 14. Dawson was to move on to 35 before he missed his attempted drive off David Willey in the 11th over of the day and his leg stump was sent tumbling.Hall brought himself on and took two wickets in three balls in the 33rd over. First Lee Daggett took a good low catch in front of him at short midwicket to dismiss Katich for 13 and then the same combination did for former Zimbabwe international Sean Ervine.Hampshire wicketkeeper Michael Bates was next to depart, for a nine-ball duck, when he edged Daggett to Stephen Peters at third slip to leave to visitors floundering on 84 for 7. The eighth-wicket pair of Vince and Chris Wood added 58 between them either side of lunch before Wood was trapped lbw by Willey for 26.Balcombe soon followed when his off stump was taken out by Jack Brooks before Willey bowled David Griffiths for a duck to end the Hampshire innings.Rob Newton went cheaply for 14 in the eighth over of Northants’ second innings when he edged Balcombe to Dawson at second slip. Peters then fell on 22 when he was pinned lbw by Ervine and Kyle Coetzer followed in the third over after tea for 25 when he was also taken by second slip off Balcombe.Dawson took his sixth catch of the match when he snared Alex Wakely (15) off the bowling of Wood but Sales went on to complete his half-century off 90 balls. He eventually perished late in the day when he was caught leg-before to give Dawson his first wicket.

Full transcript of Kaneria, Westfield hearing

22-Jun-2012Danish KANERIA & Mervyn WESTFIELD1. DETERMINATION2. A Disciplinary Panel of the Cricket Discipline Commission (Gerard Elias QC, Chair; David Gabbitass & Jamie Dalrymple) sat between 18th and 22nd June 2012, in the Hearing Room of Sport Resolutions UK, to consider Disciplinary Charges brought by the England & Wales Cricket Board (ECB) against Danish Kaneria & Mervyn Westfield.Ian Mill QC & Nick de Marco represented ECB
Tim Moloney QC & Steven Hourigan represented DK.
M Milliken-Smith QC represented Mervyn Westfield3. Introduction4. These proceedings arise from charges brought in relation to events which occurred towards the end of the 2009 English domestic cricket season at a Pro40 Competition match played at Durham between Essex and Durham.
5. Danish Kaneria contested the two charges brought against him but, on the first day of the proceedings, Mervyn Westfield pleaded guilty to the single charge against him and his case was put back for later consideration of the appropriate penalty.6. ChargesDanish Kaneria1 Alleged a breach of 2009 Directive 3.8.5 in that Danish Kaneria induced or encouraged, or attempted to induce or encourage, Mervyn Westfield not to perform on his merits, that is, to deliberately concede a minimum number of runs in his first over of the match between Essex and Durham.2 Alleged a breach of 2009 Directive 3.3 in that Danish Kaneria conducted himself in such a manner as may bring the game of cricket or any cricketer into disrepute by inducing or encouraging Mervyn Westfield not to perform on his merits.Mervyn Westfield1 Alleged a breach of 2009 Directive 3.8.15 in that Mervyn Westfield received a reward, resulting from his conduct in the Durham Essex match, which could bring him or the game of cricket into disrepute.This charge reflected Westfield’s admission to the Crown Court (see para 9 below) that he had been paid £6000 for agreeing to deliberately concede a given minimum number of runs in his first over as a bowler in the Durham v Essex Pro 40 match on 5th September 2009.7. IngredientsIn essence, therefore, on the facts alleged, to establish the contested charges , the ECB was required to prove that:1 Danish Kaneria knowingly induced or encouraged Mervyn Westfield not to perform on his merits in the Durham match.2 Danish Kaneria conducted himself in such a manner as to bring cricket or a cricketer into disrepute – and the ECB put its case on this charge upon the same factual basis as Charge 1, namely that his conduct as shown in Charge 1 brought the game into disrepute.8. Burden & Standard of ProofThe burden of proving the charges falls on the ECB who bring them. We heard submissions in relation to the appropriate Standard of Proof.
We are satisfied that the appropriate standard of proof is proof on the balance of probabilities but, that having regard to the grave nature of the allegations and the consequences of any finding of guilt in relation to them that we should look for very cogent proof before making any adverse finding against Danish Kaneria. The Panel concluded that in reality this meant that we should be sure of any fact before we relied upon it as proving a case against Danish Kaneria.9. Background FactsDanish Kaneria is a Pakistani national and a professional international cricketer of great repute and experience. He played for Essex County Cricket Club for 6 seasons between 2004 -2010 as an overseas player. He signed annual undertakings to abide by the ECB’s Rules Regulations and Directives whilst registered at Essex.Mervyn Westfield was a professional cricketer with Essex from 2005 until 2010. In that time, he played 7 County Championship matches and 8 first team one day matches.
Westfield was charged by the CPS in November 2010 with accepting a corrupt payment (£6000) contrary to section 1(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 and on January 12 2012 he pleaded guilty to that charge. On 17 February 2012, Westfield was sentenced to a term of 4 months imprisonment and the £6000 was confiscated.Arun or Anu Bhatt is an Indian businessman who, prior to November 2007, had come to the notice of the Anti Corruption & Security Unit (ACSU) of the International Cricket Council as allegedly being heavily involved in illegal betting.10. Specific EvidenceAlan Peacock is a Senior Investigator in ACSU based in Dubai.
We accept his unchallenged evidence that in April 2008 he warned Danish Kaneria that Anu Bhatt was heavily involved in illegal betting and was therefore “highly inappropriate company” for Kaneria to be keeping.Danish Kaneria told him that he had known Anu Bhatt since mid 2005 and, with his wife, had visited his home in India in November 2007 for dinner. Kaneria told us that thereafter he regarded Bhatt as a “dangerous ” man with whom to be involved.Mervyn Westfield gave evidence to us. His account was obviously central and vital to the prosecution case.We remind ourselves that there are reasons to scrutinise his evidence with great care – he has admitted his own involvement and may have a reason to lie to implicate another or others, and minimise his own involvement or responsibility. We have borne this very much in mind in considering his evidence.We remind ourselves also that Westfield’s accounts have not been uniformly honest or consistent – putting it straightforwardly and shortly, in various ways and over a period of time, he sought to minimise his involvement and it was not until his final plea to the Crown Court or even, arguably, his evidence to us in these proceedings, that he accepted not only that he had received corrupt money but also that he had not performed on his merits.Of course, therefore, we must scrutinise his evidence with great care and look for independent support for his account before using any of it against Danish Kaneria.What did we make of him?In summary, we are satisfied that in September 2009 he was both vulnerable & naïve – relatively unworldly & unsophisticated. He may well have been going through a phase of self doubt and anxiety – whether objectively justified or not – about his cricketing future.The key parts of his evidence about events late in August and early September 2009 – essentially the core of the prosecution case – can be summarised as follows:

  • Danish Kaneria told him about spot fixing & said “you are young & its hard to make money; I have a way that you can make money quicker”.
  • Kaneria introduced him to two Asian men & they went to Dukes nightclub where one man “flashed his money around”;
  • At the Essex training ground a direct approach was made by one of the Asian men to Westfield that he would receive payment if he conceded more than 12 runs in his first over in the Durham match.
  • When the squad for Durham was known, Kaneria asked Westfield if he would go through with the plan.
  • Thereafter, there was pressure from the Asian man and Kaneria to go through with the plan, culminating in a meeting in Durham on the night before the match in the hotel where the Asian men were staying.
  • Kaneria at this time was saying “It will be easy”; “You won’t get caught”; ” Lots of people have put money on the game, you have to do it”.
  • Westfield did not perform on his merits in the match & believed he had deliberately conceded the agreed amount of runs in the relevant over.
  • In Kaneria’s car, after leaving the car park in Chelmsford around midnight or later – after returning from Durham by coach – Westfield was accompanied by Kaneria & the two Asian men, one of whom gave him a parcel which contained £6000.There is no doubt – and no suggestion to the contrary – that one of the Asian men referred to by Westfield was Anu Bhatt. Indeed, Danish Kaneria admits introducing Westfield to Bhatt in Dukes nightclub and confirms in his evidence that Bhatt was in Durham and attended the match with tickets obtained by Kaneria for him.Mr Moloney QC invites us to say that because of Westfield’s earlier & sustained prevarications and lies, that Westfield is a witness who can carry no credibility and whose evidence is thus worthless.All members of this panel reject that submission. Not only did we all form the view that in these important particulars, Westfield was plainly telling the truth, we are fortified in our conclusions by other independent evidence which on any common sense analysis strongly supports his core account, from which, it is right to say, he was essentially unwavering in evidence to us.I refer, of course, firstly to the evidence of telephone and text contacts between Bhatt and Kaneria through the critical days running up to and immediately after the Durham match. It is plainly nonsensical to claim – as Danish Kaneria does – that these are explicable as being mere inconsequential social intercourse with no significance whatsoever. Rather, we have no doubt, they support in material particulars the account of Westfield and evidence the obvious planning required to set up and pressurise – as well as pay off – the man selected to perform this nefarious task of spot fixing.We would observe, also, that these contacts, both in degree and substance, tend to give the lie to the suggestion made by Danish Kaneria repeatedly that he wished to keep this “dangerous” man at arms length.Secondly, there is what we might describe as the Geographical Whereabouts evidence – was it the merest coincidence that:
  • Bhatt was introduced to Westfield at Dukes Nightclub by Kaneria?
  • Bhatt was present on the ground in Durham because Kaneria obtained the tickets for him?We have no doubt that the answer is no – and that these are yet further pointers that the core account of Westfield to us is true.There is a third area of evidence which tends to support Westfield’s core account – that is the evidence of the other Essex players to the effect, taken together, that on more than one occasion on coach journeys, Danish Kaneria sought to instigate discussion about spot or match fixing.We acknowledge that not all the detailed evidence given about this chimes precisely together – but that is hardly surprising given the time that has elapsed. What is striking, however, is the overwhelming impression of most that it was Danish Kaneria who initiated the discussions about ways of making money on the rest of the Pro 40 programme. This, coupled with the evidence of some players of a more direct approach to sound them out, leaves us in no doubt that these conversations and approaches were designed to “test the water” – to see who might succumb to the pressure to make corrupt money.It is right to record that all the players approached or made part of any conversation did not take the matter seriously. We observe that this was 2009 and very different education for county cricketers exists now from what was in place then in respect of Anti-Corruption training.We have in mind the further points made, suggesting that Westfield is not to be believed including:
  • the questions and answers and explanation or lack of it for the money in excess of £6000 in Westfield’s bank account;
  • The 30th August point – it was that day it is suggested that Kaneria took Westfield to Dukes;On balance, and principally because of the telephone and text message evidence, we favour the view that the Dukes Nightclub visit was likely to have been after 30 August – but we do not make that finding with certainty, However, we conclude, that whenever it occurred, Kaneria introduced Bhatt to Westfield and that this introduction was for the purpose of facilitating betting and spot fixing and not for some innocent social reason.11. Danish KaneriaIt is a trite but true comment that some of the most cogent evidence for the prosecution often comes from the mouth of the defendant himself.We have borne in mind the fact that Danish Kaneria is a man of hitherto good character, with good character references, and that we should be slow to disbelieve the account he gives.However, we consider that in many respects the evidence of Danish Kaneria simply does not stand up to scrutiny and is plainly lies.We utterly reject his account of the telephone calls and texts to and from Anu Bhatt during the vital days in question. Analysis of the length, sequence and timing of these calls simply does not permit of the innocent explanations given by Kaneria. If, as we find, he is lying about these calls and texts, there can only be one logical reason – to tell the truth would be damning.Further, we reject as nonsensical Kaneria’s claim that his invitation to Bhatt to attend Dukes Nightclub was in order to keep him at arms length or similarly that obtaining tickets for him in Durham was with the same object. Again, we have no doubt that to tell the truth would implicate Kaneria as the link in the chain between Westfield and Bhatt.There were many other unsatisfactory aspects to Danish Kaneria’s evidence – not least the grasp of detailed recollections years after the event when two years before little more than a glimmer of recollection appeared to surface.However, in the light of our findings as to the significant aspects of Westfield and Kaneria’s evidence, it is perhaps unnecessary to dwell any further on the evidence of Danish Kaneria. We reject his basic account that he had nothing to do with any arrangement between Westfield and Bhatt – indeed we are sure that he facilitated it.12. His WitnessesWe have considered carefully the evidence of Faran Kaneria & Mohammed Afzaal Nasir but conclude that it does not disturb our sure findings in relation to the reliability of Westfield on the core points. It does not follow from our findings that either of these witnesses was necessarily untruthful – as submitted by Mr Mill QC for the ECB, there are a number of possible permutations as to the date of the Dukes Nightclub visit.We record here that we have considered all the evidence put forward on behalf of Kaneria by way of written statement and taken it into account in reaching our conclusions.
    We also record the fact that during the hearing and when giving evidence, Danish Kaneria had the benefit of an experienced interpreter.13. ConclusionsHaving heard and considered all the evidence and submissions made to us, we are left in no doubt that in late August/ early September 2009:

  • Danish Kaneria knew the activity which Anu Bhatt was engaged in;
  • Kaneria acted as a recruiter of spot fixers for Anu Bhatt;
  • That Kaneria approached a number of what he saw as potential targets at Essex;
  • Kaneria introduced Bhatt to Westfield with the intention that Westfield should be recruited into spot fixing;
  • Thereafter, Kaneria cajoled and pressurised Westfield into becoming involved, well knowing that he was young and vulnerable;
  • Kaneria was present at the meeting in Durham with Westfield and the two Asian men – one of whom was Anu Bhatt
  • Kaneria was present when Westfield was paid out by the Asian men.It follows from these findings that we are left in no reasonable doubt thatDanish Kaneria knowingly induced or encouraged Mervyn Westfield not to perform on his merits in the Durham match such that the first charge against him is made out.Further, it is self evident that such conduct brings the game of cricket and cricketers into disrepute and thus Charge 2 is also proved.Later today we shall consider submissions in relation to the appropriate penalties to be applied.Gerard Elias QC (Chairman)
    David Gabbitass
    Jamie Dalrymple 22-06-2012

  • Hat-trick of wins gives England series

    England Women completed their sterling comeback in the five-match ODI series, recording their third straight win against India Women, in Wormsley, to win 3-2

    ESPNcricinfo staff11-Jul-2012
    ScorecardThe fine weather didn’t last 100 overs at Wormsley, but it lasted long enough for England to convincingly seal the ODI series•Getty Images

    England Women completed their sterling comeback in the five-match ODI series, recording their third straight win against India Women, in Wormsley, to win 3-2. Chasing 153, England were a rather comfortable 124 for 4 after 36 overs when the rain came down to end the match, and as per Duckworth-Lewis calculations they had won by 29 runs.England chose to bowl, and had India in trouble straightaway at 2 for 3. Harmanpreet Kaur made sure India got into triple digits with a hard-fought 40, before lower order cameos got them to 152 for 8. The most damage was inflicted by England’s opening bowlers, Georgia Elwiss and Katherine Brunt, who took five wickets between them while conceding only 36 runs in their 20. Later Elwiss, who claimed six wickets in the series, was named Player of the Series.India struck an early blow in the chase, Jhulan Goswami removing captain Charlotte Edwards, the double-digit cameos that followed from the rest of the top order were enough to give England the game. The most effective of the lot came from Sarah Taylor, who knocked off 21 at more than a run a ball. Lydia Greenway top scored with an unbeaten 37.

    Smith savours 'wonderful' triumph

    Graeme Smith was breathing a sigh of relief after South Africa secured a 51-run victory at Lord’s to rise to top the world Test rankings

    ESPNcricinfo staff20-Aug-2012Graeme Smith was breathing a sigh of relief after South Africa secured a 51-run victory at Lord’s to rise to top the world Test rankings. They were given a scare during the final session, as Matt Prior and Graeme Swann had a dart before the second new ball, but they held their nerve and Vernon Philander finished the series with two wickets in two balls.”It was a top Test match, the wicket played its part and both teams played well,” Smith said. “We really had to set up the game and work hard for that. There was some great batting from Matt Prior and Graeme Swann, some great shots, to put us under pressure and it was wonderful to come through.”I stayed with the belief. You do start to have nervous moments but you just have to stay focused and know that they would have to do something spectacular. Vernon got it perfect.”Andrew Strauss had admitted England were outplayed in all departments during the series and Smith pinpointed South Africa’s ability to post big totals – led by their 637 for 2 at The Oval – as a key part of their success.”We are able to post totals and build partnerships to get scores on the board which allowed out bowlers a little more freedom,” he said. “It allowed them to attack and get the rewards. We caught well, too. It’s a long time to stay focused and deal with the pressure. To have won 2-0 is a great feeling.”During the presentation Smith carried a hastily scribbled message to Mark Boucher on his shirt. ‘We miss u Bouch’ it simply read after the wicketkeeper had been forced to retire during the early days of the tour when he sustained an awful eye injury at Taunton.”I know that he is watching,” Smith said. “It’s a message from all of us. He’s been an integral part of Proteas for 147 games and this was meant to be his 150th Test. We just wanted to let him know he was with us here today.”Looking ahead, Smith acknowledged that it would not be easy to hold on to top spot, as England have spent the last year finding out, and wants South Africa to develop a strong squad of players.”We need to have a strong base so when the wind blows we can handle ourselves,” he said. “We need to increase our bowling depth in case we get injuries and have players who can come in and perform. These guys have built a formidable unit but we have Australia next and that will be an awesome challenge for us. Hopefully we can push forward and take control.”

    Allrounder Ron Tindall dies aged 76

    Ron Tindall, who has died in Western Australia at the age of 76, won household fame as a footballer with Chelsea, but he was a very good cricketer as well

    ESPNcricinfo staff12-Sep-2012Ron Tindall, who has died in Western Australia at the age of 76, won household fame as a footballer with Chelsea, scoring 69 goals in 174 appearances and forming a potent striking partnership with Jimmy Greaves. But he was a very good cricketer as well, playing for Surrey as an offspinning allrounder, scoring 5446 runs at 24.86 and taking 150 wickets at 32.38.As a professional footballer, Tindall had time to play cricket in the summer and he was on Surrey’s books from 1956 to 1966. He made his debut in 1956 but only played a handful of matches until 1960 when he broke into a side which was starting to rebuild after its domination in the 1950s. In 1961 he scored the first of his two first-class hundreds but his career really blossomed after he left Chelsea.Between 1962 and 1965 he was a regular in the side and in 1962, with Jim Laker and Alex Bedser both retired, he enjoyed his best summer with the ball, taking 66 wickets at 23.92 including his career-best figures of 5 for 41. The following summer he passed 1000 runs for the only time, finishing with 1063 at 27.25.He stopped playing at the end of 1966 by which time he was ensconced at Portsmouth FC where he finished his career as a player and moved into management. He emigrated to Australia in 1975 to become Western Australia’s director of football and stayed there for the rest of his life. In 2008 was awarded the Order of Australia Medal for services to sport.Tindall’s footballing career had start in Chelsea’s youth team and he made his first-team debut in 1955. Although usually a centre forward, he was versatile enough to be used at full back and on occasions in goal. In 1960-61 he scored 16 goals and Greaves 43, their combined total still a club record for a striking partnership. But later that year he was sold to West Ham and then to Reading before he joined Portsmouth.

    Gauchan claims extraordinary figures

    Round-up of the ICC World Cricket League Division Four matches in Kuala Lumpur

    ESPNcricinfo staff06-Sep-2012Nepal maintained their unbeaten start with a massive 10-wicket victory against hosts Malaysia. Shakti Gauchan, the legspinner, claimed the extraordinary figures of 3 for 2 in 10 overs, a spell that included eight maidens after Amrit Bhattarai had set the ball rolling with two wickets in two balls. From 52 for 3 in the 12th over, Malaysia lost their remaining seven wickets for 17 runs in a painful 20 overs. In reply, Nepal needed little more than 12 overs to speed to their target and Anil Mandal ended unbeaten on 41.Reflecting on his mind-boggling figures, Gauchan said: “I didn’t think much about my performance before the game, but my objective was to bowl in the right area which I did during the game and it turned out to be my best bowling performance.”Captain Paras Khadka added: “It was another great bowling display from the team, especially from Gauchan and the other opening pairs. Although we had a small target to chase, I am happy with the batting performance of the openers as the batter and won the match for us convincingly. We still can’t relax after this win and will work hard to win the rest of our matches.”USA also crushed Tanzania with an incredible 246 balls to spare as they raced to a seven-wicket victory at Kinrara Academy Oval. USA’s bowlers shared around their success, with Usman Shuja taking three wickets, as Tanzania crumbled to 92 all out in the 30th over. The run chase did not even reach the tenth over. Opener Steven Taylor clubbed 46 off 22 balls, including four sixes, as USA needed less than half a Twenty20 innings to seal victory – and a handsome boost to their net run-rate.The USA captain, Steve Massiah, said: “It was professional approach today and things went according to the game plan and we executed brilliantly what we had planned. We knew how critical this match was going to be for us and winning it with a big margin will help us to boost out net run-rate.”In the most evenly contest target of the day, Singapore beat Denmark by four wickets to keep themselves in the mid-table battle. Chasing 174 they relied on contributions all through their top order with the first five batsmen making between 23 and 39. The innings was always under control and Munish Arora, the 41-year-old, guided the team home. Earlier, the Denmark innings had subsided from 128 for 3 and they ended up not using 21 deliveries. Shehzad Ahmed made 50 off 100 balls but when he fell they fell away swiftly as the last seven wickets fell for 45.